Organizational Management Analysis
Pricing and Administration
For ordering information, please contact the Knowledge Centre at
1-888-267-2772 or email
AskSRC@cpsa.com.
Available in English only.
There is no time commitment for the Organizational Management Analysis as this report
is based on the results of participants who have taken the Checkpoint 360.
Mapping your organization′s path to success by getting the best from your
management team
What it Measures
The Organizational Management Analysis (OMA) is a report compiled
from the information obtained from the individual Checkpoint 360 results of a group
of managers. The report summarizes the perceptions of a management group with input
from the manager′s bosses, peers and direct reports.
Report Output
I. Critical Skill Set Summary
Identifies what the Manager and their Boss(es) considered the most critical Skill
Sets for each Manager's job performance.
II. Critical Skill Set Alignment
Indicates where Boss(es) and Managers were in alignment with their Critical Skill
Set selections.
III. Organizational Development Summary - All Raters
This graph shows what percentage of the raters (excluding Self) identified their
Manager as being below, within, or above the Favorable Zone. *
Organizational Development Summary - Direct Reports
This graph shows what percentage of the Direct Reports identified their Manager
as being below, within, or above the Favorable Zone.
Skill Set Comparative Analysis
This section summarizes the information provided in each of the Manager's Checkpoint
reports. This displays the percentage of the 18 Skill Sets rated below, within,
or above the Favorable Zone.
II. Organizational Development Priorities
This section identifies those Managers whose skills were rated as needing improvement.
III. Organizational Training Needs Analysis
This section targets areas for training appropriate for each of the Managers.
* The Favorable Zone represents a range where a group of effective managers and
leaders were typically rated by others on the CheckPoint 360. These leaders were
from a wide range of industries and organizations, and had all been identified as
good performers by their respective companies.